Home > M.R. Bauer Foundation > 1996 Summary Report > Dan Margoliash, Ph.D.

Dan Margoliash, Ph.D.


Professor, Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1996

Functional Organization of the Bird Song System:
Implications for How What's Learned Where

Bird song and its neurobiological substrates are central topics in ethology and neuroethology. Birds learn their songs from external tutors, and have an elaborate system of forebrain, mid brain, and brainstem nuclei involved in aspects of song memorization, learning, perception, and production. Behavioral studies have identified critical elements of the theory of song learning, but the neural implementation of this theory has yet to be described. A connectionist modeling study has demonstrated that neurons in the nucleus ovoidalis, part of the ascending auditory system, exhibit responses to complex stimuli such as song that can be predicted from the neurons’ responses to simple stimuli such as tone and noise bursts. Thus, there is no evidence that the auditory response properties of these neurons are modified by the song learning process.

Indeed, to date the modification of neural sensory structures that must accompany song memorization early in life has yet to be described. A recent 2DG study suggests field L (which receives from ovoidalis and projects to HVc) may be an attractive candidate structure. In contrast, there is strong evidence that the forebrain nucleus HVc is a site of sensorimotor integration in the birdsong system. Auditory neurons in the HVc of all species tested respond selectively to the individual bird’s own (autogenous) song, including neurons that exhibit strict temporal combination sensitivity. The parameters of autogenous song are specified by environmental influences during vocal learning, hence it is hypothesized that the HVc neurons shape, and are shaped by, the sensorimotor phase of learning. The representation of autogenous song has unusual features, including a global synchrony related to syllabic features of the song. These features vary between individuals, emphasizing the idiosyncratic nature of neural representations of such forms of complex learning.

The syllabic representation at the level of HVc is also observed in single neuron activity recorded during singing in zebra finch. HVc neurons have a motor recruitment activity pattern that is specific for each syllable type, independent of syllable position, and varies from neuron to neuron. Thus, during production HVc neurons encode for syllable identity.

The syllable is a motor program, generally involving all syringeal muscles, and co-articulation with the vocal tract, respiratory, and postural systems. Hence, the code at the level of HVc is not muscle based. Elucidation of the HVc code in the adult, and its establishment during sensorimotor development, will be of major importance for determining the neural mechanisms of idiosyncratic learning. Understanding the mapping between the auditory response and motor recruitment properties of the same HVc neurons remains a major theoretical challenge - how is auditory feedback used to guide vocal learning if it has no apparent relation to the ongoing motor program at the physiological level. To date, however, these same properties have yet to be assessed in juvenile birds. The motor recruitment properties of neurons in RA, which is the major forebrain output structure and receives from HVc, differ dramatically from those of HVc neurons. RA neurons exhibit highly synchronized bursts of activity associated with sub-syllabic acoustic features such as notes. Thus, there is a hierarchical organization of the motor system that is related to the hierarchical organization of the segmental temporal structure of the vocalizations. The analysis of the mechanisms of syringeal action will be essential for a deep understanding of coding in this system.

 

 

 

Speaker Schedule  |  Reports from Previous Years
Top of Page | Life Sciences | Brandeis University