Home > M.R. Bauer Foundation > 1999 Summary Report > Charles C. Gross, Ph.D.

Charles C. Gross, Ph.D.


Professor of Psychology
Princeton University
Princeton, New Jersey
November 2, 1998

The Hippocampus Minor and Man's Place in Nature:
A Case Study in the Social Construction of Neuroanatomy

In mid-nineteenth century Britain the possibility of evolution and particularly the evolution of man from apes was vigorously contested. Among the leading anti-evolutionists was the celebrated anatomist and paleontologist, Sir Richard Owen and among the leading defenders of evolution was T. H. Huxley.

In his argument against the evolution of humans from apes and, more generally, against the possibility of organic evolution, Owen claimed that the human brain was fundamentally different from that of the ape brain and therefore the transmutation of one species into the other was impossible. The uniqueness of the human brain, he claimed, was that only it had a "hippocampus minor". This structure, today termed the "calcar avis" is in fact, a rather small indentation in the wall of the lateral ventricle of the brain.

Huxley set out on a systematic campaign to disprove Owen's claim of the uniqueness of the human brain. His purpose was not merely to correct Owen's supposed anatomical error, but to portray him as dishonest and incompetent and therefore to eliminate him as a credible critic of Darwin's theory of evolution. Huxley and his allies proceded to demonstrate (and exaggerate) the existence of a hippocampus minor in a great variety of primate species. In the course of his anatomical studies Huxley discovered and named the calcarine sulcus. The controversy over the hippocamus minor evoked widespread interest in the lay media. Huxley used it to help transfer power from the dominent Oxbridge clergyman-naturalists to the new professional scientists, at the center of which were Huxley and his allies.

At this time little was known about the functions of the brain structure. Owen's stress on the importance of ventricular anatomy derived from the central position of the brain ventricles in Galen's system of physiology which had dominated physiology and medicine from the second century into the nineteenth.

This tale illustrates both the extraordinary persistence of ideas in biology and the role of the political and social matrix of science. It also exemplifies the continuing attempt of humans to differentiate themselves from the rest of the animal kingdom.

 

 

Speaker Schedule for Current Year  |  Reports from Previous Years
Top of Page | Life Sciences | Brandeis University