Home > M.R. Bauer Foundation > 1999 Summary Report > Emilio Salinas, Ph.D.

1999 Scientific Retreat
Emilio Salinas, Ph.D.


Instituto de FisioloiaCelular
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico
February 23, 1999

Stimulus Encoding During Somatosensory Discrimination:
Spike Timing, Firing Rate and Signal-to-Noise Modulations

The sensation of flutter is felt when mechanical vibrations between 5-50 Hz are applied to the skin. Some primary somatosensory neurons are driven very effectively by periodic flutter stimuli; their evoked spike trains typically have a periodic structure, with highly regular time differences between spikes. It has been strongly argued that these time intervals may underly a subject's capacity to discriminate flutter frequencies. Is it true that periodicity in cortical spikes plays a functional role? Do cortical somatosensory neurons exploit such a temporal code? We investigated these hypotheses by analyzing extracellular recordings from primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices of monkeys trained to perform a frequency discrimination task.

The analysis was based on Shannon's mutual information, which is a powerful statistic that measures the strength of association between two variables. We found that the information about stimulus frequency carried by the periodic spike intervals was indeed extremely high in S1 but decreased dramatically in S2, whereas the information provided by the mean rate was moderate but similar across areas. Many S2 neurons sustained their responses for a few hundred milliseconds after stimulus offset, during an inter-stimulus period in which the monkey needs to remember the stimulus frequency. The information provided by the firing rate during this period was still substantial, but the information from spike periodicity was practically extinguished. Additionally, the firing rate also conveyed information about average frequency during discrimination based on periodic vibrations---by design, information from spike timing is practically eliminated with these stimuli. Finally, only the firing rate signal was enhanced by the behavioral significance of the stimuli.

Hence, we conclude that the neural code for flutter frequency is probably based on firing rate; the exquisite timing of stimulus-driven spikes in S1 seems unrelated to it. These results attach a cautionary note to studies in which functional relationships are inferred exclusively from observed correlations between neuronal firing and variations in stimulus or behavior: some neuronal response attributes may covary greatly and accurately with physical quantities without necessarily having any meaning in the language of neuronal interactions.

 

Speaker Schedule for Current Year  |  Reports from Previous Years
Top of Page | Life Sciences | Brandeis University