Reports from Previous Years

Speaker Schedule for Current Year

Life Sciences Home

Brandeis University

  Home > M.R. Bauer Foundation > Reports from Previous Years >2005 > Nancy Kanwisher, Ph.D.
Nancy Kanwisher, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts
December 6, 2004

fMRI of Visual Recognition

Dr. Nancy Kanwisher, Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at MIT, described some of her recent studies of the neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying human visual perception and cognition. In her previous work, she has investigated object recognition, visual attention, and perceptual awareness, as well as response selection, social cognition and the human understanding of numbers. Kanwisher is best known for her pioneering work that has identified several regions of the human brain that seem to play specialized roles in the perception of specific categories of visual stimuli such as faces, places, and bodies.

Some of Kanwisher’s evidence that face perception is mediated by special cognitive and neural mechanisms comes from her functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of the human brain’s fusiform face area (FFA) and from behavioral studies of the “face inversion effect.” Kanwisher combined these two methods to ask whether face perception mechanisms are stimulus specific, process specific, or both. In those experiments subjects discriminated pairs of upright or inverted faces or house stimuli that differed in either the spatial distance among parts (configuration) or the shape of the parts. The FFA showed a much higher response to faces than to houses, but no preference for the configuration task over the part task. Similarly, the behavioral, face inversion effect was as large in the part task as the configuration task for faces, but absent in both part and configuration tasks for houses. According to Kanwisher, these finding indicate that face perception mechanisms are not process specific for parts or configuration but are domain specific: that is, they are selective face stimuli per se.

Kanwisher acknowledged that function of the fusiform face area (FFA), a face-selective region in human extra striate cortex, remains a matter of active debate. To bring clarity to the issue, she measured the trial-by-trial correlation between FFA activity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioral outcomes in perceptual tasks. Her results show that FFA activation is correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with both detecting the presence of faces and identifying specific faces. However, for most non-face objects (including cars seen by car experts), within-category identification performance was correlated with activation in other regions of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex, not the FFA. These results indicate that the FFA is involved in both detection and identification of faces, but that it has little involvement in within-category identification of non-face objects (including objects of expertise).

Together with her post-doctoral student, Chris Baker, and Eli Pelli of Harvard’s Department of Ophthalmology, Kanwisher has explored neural plasticity and reorganization. In these studies she exploited disease-related changes in retinal function that are associated with macular degeneration (MD), the leading cause of visual impairment in the developed world. MD damages the central retina, obliterating fovea vision and severely disrupting everyday tasks such as reading, driving, and face recognition. In such cases, the macular damage eliminates the normal retinal input to a large region of visual cortex, comprising tens of square centimeters of surface area in each hemisphere, which is normally responsive only to fovea stimuli. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, Kanwisher and colleagues asked whether this deprived cortex simply becomes inactive in subjects with MD, or whether it takes on new functional properties. In two adult MD subjects with extensive bilateral central retinal lesions, Kanwisher and colleagues found that parts of visual cortex (including primary visual cortex) that normally respond only to central visual stimuli are strongly activated by peripheral stimuli.

Such activation was not observed (1) with visual stimuli presented to the position of the former fovea, or (2) in control subjects with visual stimuli presented to corresponding parts of peripheral retina. These remarkable results demonstrate large-scale reorganization of the brain and of visual processing in MD, and will likely prove important in any effort to develop new strategies for rehabilitation of MD subjects.


 

 

 

Speaker Schedule  |  Reports from Previous Years
Top of Page | Life Sciences | Brandeis University